G-21VCE8Y34V

Local Transit Authority Invests in Cutting-Edge Trains to Enhance Passenger Journeys

In Poland, the regional train company Koleje mazowieckie is stepping up its game by ordering new electric and diesel multiple-units to refresh its fleet.

On march 31, they confirmed a deal with Stadler for an additional 14 five-car ER160 Flirt3 electric units, along with an extensive maintenance plan lasting 18 years. CEO Robert Stępień emphasized that this move isn’t just about upgrading trains; it’s about enhancing the overall travel experience for passengers. “We aim to be one of the leading regional operators in Poland, committed to top-notch service,” he stated.

The European Union is chipping in with funding of around 162 million złoty out of a total order cost of approximately 669 million złoty. This latest order utilizes one of four options from a framework agreement established in June 2024 that allows for up to 75 units, bringing their total firm orders to an notable count of 64.

Koleje Mazowieckie already has ten Flirts from a previous contract signed in 2006 and another batch of sixty-one acquired through a framework agreement made in 2018.

The first trains from this new order are expected within two years from Stadler’s Siedlce facility and will serve key routes including Siedlce, Łowicz, Skierniewice, Radom, and Działdowo.

The five-car models will accommodate up to six hundred passengers—279 seated—and come equipped with essential safety features like defibrillators and intercoms for emergency communication with drivers. They’ll reach speeds up to160 km/h and include ETCS Level 2 technology for enhanced operational efficiency.

Additonally, Koleje mazowieckie has placed an order for six two-car DMUs (231Ma) from Pesa Bydgoszcz set to roll out by Q2 of2028 on various routes such as Tłuszcz – Ostrołęka – Chorzele and Sochaczew – Kutno – Płock – Sierpc – Nasielsk – Nowy Dwór mazowiecki among others.


czesław Sulima from the board mentioned that while hydrogen or battery-powered trains were considered as alternatives during planning stages, they ultimately decided against them due to uncertainties regarding long-term costs involved. This decision reflects a cautious approach towards sustainable transport solutions amidst evolving technologies.

You might also like

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.